The MOVE Framework: Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The MOVE Framework : Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change. / Power, Seamus A.; Velez, Gabriel.

I: Review of General Psychology, Bind 24, Nr. 4, 12.2020, s. 321-334.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Power, SA & Velez, G 2020, 'The MOVE Framework: Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change', Review of General Psychology, bind 24, nr. 4, s. 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020915841

APA

Power, S. A., & Velez, G. (2020). The MOVE Framework: Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020915841

Vancouver

Power SA, Velez G. The MOVE Framework: Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change. Review of General Psychology. 2020 dec.;24(4):321-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020915841

Author

Power, Seamus A. ; Velez, Gabriel. / The MOVE Framework : Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change. I: Review of General Psychology. 2020 ; Bind 24, Nr. 4. s. 321-334.

Bibtex

@article{83e22fe22d8d411a8f9fd99096634135,
title = "The MOVE Framework: Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change",
abstract = "Social psychologists are often criticized for failing to capture the dynamic nature of psychological processes. We present a novel framework to address this problem. The MOVE framework contends that to comprehend complex, contradictory, and divergent patterns of thought, affect, and behavior within changing, real-world contexts, it is necessary to undertake ecologically valid research that is attentive to the lived experiences and meaning-making processes of culturally embedded individuals over time. A focus on meanings, observations, viewpoints, and experiences is essential for social psychological research that holistically captures how people construct, understand, respond, position, and act over time within changing social, economic, and political contexts. To illustrate the utility of our proposition, we draw on classic social psychological studies and multimethod fieldwork during a period of rapid social and political change in Colombia during the peace process (2012-2017). We argue the MOVE framework has the potential to advance psychological understandings of, and contributions to, individuals embedded in real, dynamic social and political contexts. We discuss the implications of this extended social psychological paradigm for advancing psychological science.",
keywords = "ecological validity, social change, qualitative methods, quantitative method, replication crisis, ULTIMATUM GAME, PSYCHOLOGY, CULTURE, REPRODUCIBILITY, PERSPECTIVE, PREJUDICE, SELF",
author = "Power, {Seamus A.} and Gabriel Velez",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/1089268020915841",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "321--334",
journal = "Review of General Psychology",
issn = "1089-2680",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The MOVE Framework

T2 - Meanings, Observations, Viewpoints, and Experiences in processes of Social Change

AU - Power, Seamus A.

AU - Velez, Gabriel

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Social psychologists are often criticized for failing to capture the dynamic nature of psychological processes. We present a novel framework to address this problem. The MOVE framework contends that to comprehend complex, contradictory, and divergent patterns of thought, affect, and behavior within changing, real-world contexts, it is necessary to undertake ecologically valid research that is attentive to the lived experiences and meaning-making processes of culturally embedded individuals over time. A focus on meanings, observations, viewpoints, and experiences is essential for social psychological research that holistically captures how people construct, understand, respond, position, and act over time within changing social, economic, and political contexts. To illustrate the utility of our proposition, we draw on classic social psychological studies and multimethod fieldwork during a period of rapid social and political change in Colombia during the peace process (2012-2017). We argue the MOVE framework has the potential to advance psychological understandings of, and contributions to, individuals embedded in real, dynamic social and political contexts. We discuss the implications of this extended social psychological paradigm for advancing psychological science.

AB - Social psychologists are often criticized for failing to capture the dynamic nature of psychological processes. We present a novel framework to address this problem. The MOVE framework contends that to comprehend complex, contradictory, and divergent patterns of thought, affect, and behavior within changing, real-world contexts, it is necessary to undertake ecologically valid research that is attentive to the lived experiences and meaning-making processes of culturally embedded individuals over time. A focus on meanings, observations, viewpoints, and experiences is essential for social psychological research that holistically captures how people construct, understand, respond, position, and act over time within changing social, economic, and political contexts. To illustrate the utility of our proposition, we draw on classic social psychological studies and multimethod fieldwork during a period of rapid social and political change in Colombia during the peace process (2012-2017). We argue the MOVE framework has the potential to advance psychological understandings of, and contributions to, individuals embedded in real, dynamic social and political contexts. We discuss the implications of this extended social psychological paradigm for advancing psychological science.

KW - ecological validity

KW - social change

KW - qualitative methods

KW - quantitative method

KW - replication crisis

KW - ULTIMATUM GAME

KW - PSYCHOLOGY

KW - CULTURE

KW - REPRODUCIBILITY

KW - PERSPECTIVE

KW - PREJUDICE

KW - SELF

U2 - 10.1177/1089268020915841

DO - 10.1177/1089268020915841

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 321

EP - 334

JO - Review of General Psychology

JF - Review of General Psychology

SN - 1089-2680

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 255046741