Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness. / Betsch, Cornelia; Böhm, Robert; Chapman, Gretchen B.

I: Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Bind 2, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 61-73.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Betsch, C, Böhm, R & Chapman, GB 2015, 'Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness', Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, bind 2, nr. 1, s. 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716

APA

Betsch, C., Böhm, R., & Chapman, G. B. (2015). Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716

Vancouver

Betsch C, Böhm R, Chapman GB. Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2015;2(1):61-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716

Author

Betsch, Cornelia ; Böhm, Robert ; Chapman, Gretchen B. / Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness. I: Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2015 ; Bind 2, Nr. 1. s. 61-73.

Bibtex

@article{22c936a6da6647af9e79836d2e1497f9,
title = "Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness",
abstract = "Even though there are policies in place, and safe and effective vaccines available, almost every country struggles with vaccine hesitancy, that is, a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination. Consequently, it is important to understand the determinants of individual vaccination decisions to establish effective strategies to support the success of country-specific public health policies. Vaccine refusal can result from complacency, inconvenience, a lack of confidence, and a rational calculation of pros and cons. Interventions should, therefore, be carefully targeted to focus on the reason for non-vaccination. We suggest that there are several interventions that may be effective for complacent, convenient, and calculating individuals whereas interventions that might be effective for those who lack confidence are scarce. Thus, efforts should be concentrated on motivating the complacent, removing barriers for those for whom vaccination is inconvenient, and adding incentives and additional utility for the calculating. These strategies might be more promising, economic, and effective than convincing those who lack confidence in vaccination.",
author = "Cornelia Betsch and Robert B{\"o}hm and Chapman, {Gretchen B.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "61--73",
journal = "Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "2372-7322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness

AU - Betsch, Cornelia

AU - Böhm, Robert

AU - Chapman, Gretchen B.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Even though there are policies in place, and safe and effective vaccines available, almost every country struggles with vaccine hesitancy, that is, a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination. Consequently, it is important to understand the determinants of individual vaccination decisions to establish effective strategies to support the success of country-specific public health policies. Vaccine refusal can result from complacency, inconvenience, a lack of confidence, and a rational calculation of pros and cons. Interventions should, therefore, be carefully targeted to focus on the reason for non-vaccination. We suggest that there are several interventions that may be effective for complacent, convenient, and calculating individuals whereas interventions that might be effective for those who lack confidence are scarce. Thus, efforts should be concentrated on motivating the complacent, removing barriers for those for whom vaccination is inconvenient, and adding incentives and additional utility for the calculating. These strategies might be more promising, economic, and effective than convincing those who lack confidence in vaccination.

AB - Even though there are policies in place, and safe and effective vaccines available, almost every country struggles with vaccine hesitancy, that is, a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination. Consequently, it is important to understand the determinants of individual vaccination decisions to establish effective strategies to support the success of country-specific public health policies. Vaccine refusal can result from complacency, inconvenience, a lack of confidence, and a rational calculation of pros and cons. Interventions should, therefore, be carefully targeted to focus on the reason for non-vaccination. We suggest that there are several interventions that may be effective for complacent, convenient, and calculating individuals whereas interventions that might be effective for those who lack confidence are scarce. Thus, efforts should be concentrated on motivating the complacent, removing barriers for those for whom vaccination is inconvenient, and adding incentives and additional utility for the calculating. These strategies might be more promising, economic, and effective than convincing those who lack confidence in vaccination.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716

DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600716

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 61

EP - 73

JO - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 2372-7322

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 241310683