Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Vaccination policy reactance : Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. / Sprengholz, Philipp; Felgendreff, Lisa; Böhm, Robert; Betsch, Cornelia.

I: Journal of Health Psychology, Bind 27, Nr. 6, 05.2022, s. 1394-1407.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sprengholz, P, Felgendreff, L, Böhm, R & Betsch, C 2022, 'Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures', Journal of Health Psychology, bind 27, nr. 6, s. 1394-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211044535

APA

Sprengholz, P., Felgendreff, L., Böhm, R., & Betsch, C. (2022). Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(6), 1394-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211044535

Vancouver

Sprengholz P, Felgendreff L, Böhm R, Betsch C. Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. Journal of Health Psychology. 2022 maj;27(6):1394-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211044535

Author

Sprengholz, Philipp ; Felgendreff, Lisa ; Böhm, Robert ; Betsch, Cornelia. / Vaccination policy reactance : Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. I: Journal of Health Psychology. 2022 ; Bind 27, Nr. 6. s. 1394-1407.

Bibtex

@article{fbc244d951bc466fa41578913250089d,
title = "Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures",
abstract = "Ending the COVID-19 pandemic will require rapid large-scale uptake of vaccines against the disease. Mandating vaccination is discussed as a suitable strategy to increase uptake. In a series of cross-sectional quota-representative surveys and two preregistered experiments conducted in Germany and the US (total N = 4629), we investigated (i) correlates of individual preferences for mandatory (vs voluntary) COVID-19 vaccination policies; (ii) potential detrimental effects of mandatory policies; and (iii) interventions potentially counteracting them. Results indicate that reactance elicited by mandates can cause detrimental effects, such as decreasing the intention to vaccinate against influenza and adhere to COVID-19 related protective measures.",
keywords = "health policy, psychological reactance, vaccination mandates",
author = "Philipp Sprengholz and Lisa Felgendreff and Robert B{\"o}hm and Cornelia Betsch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1177/13591053211044535",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1394--1407",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vaccination policy reactance

T2 - Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures

AU - Sprengholz, Philipp

AU - Felgendreff, Lisa

AU - Böhm, Robert

AU - Betsch, Cornelia

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - Ending the COVID-19 pandemic will require rapid large-scale uptake of vaccines against the disease. Mandating vaccination is discussed as a suitable strategy to increase uptake. In a series of cross-sectional quota-representative surveys and two preregistered experiments conducted in Germany and the US (total N = 4629), we investigated (i) correlates of individual preferences for mandatory (vs voluntary) COVID-19 vaccination policies; (ii) potential detrimental effects of mandatory policies; and (iii) interventions potentially counteracting them. Results indicate that reactance elicited by mandates can cause detrimental effects, such as decreasing the intention to vaccinate against influenza and adhere to COVID-19 related protective measures.

AB - Ending the COVID-19 pandemic will require rapid large-scale uptake of vaccines against the disease. Mandating vaccination is discussed as a suitable strategy to increase uptake. In a series of cross-sectional quota-representative surveys and two preregistered experiments conducted in Germany and the US (total N = 4629), we investigated (i) correlates of individual preferences for mandatory (vs voluntary) COVID-19 vaccination policies; (ii) potential detrimental effects of mandatory policies; and (iii) interventions potentially counteracting them. Results indicate that reactance elicited by mandates can cause detrimental effects, such as decreasing the intention to vaccinate against influenza and adhere to COVID-19 related protective measures.

KW - health policy

KW - psychological reactance

KW - vaccination mandates

U2 - 10.1177/13591053211044535

DO - 10.1177/13591053211044535

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34488460

AN - SCOPUS:85114387275

VL - 27

SP - 1394

EP - 1407

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 346536716